'New' Life Insurance Travel Guidelines
New life insurance travel guidelines from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) are aimed at protecting consumers from discriminatory underwriting practices by life insurance companies in the sale of life insurance. These guidelines limit an insurance company’s ability to deny an applicant life insurance based solely on lawful past travel or lawful future travel
Ready to compare quick life insurance quotes?
Your life insurance quotes are always free.
Secured with SHA-256 Encryption
UPDATED: Oct 28, 2020
It’s all about you. We want to help you make the right life insurance coverage choices.
Advertiser Disclosure: We strive to help you make confident life insurance decisions. Comparison shopping should be easy. We are not affiliated with any one life insurance company and cannot guarantee quotes from any single company.
Our life insurance industry partnerships don’t influence our content. Our opinions are our own. To compare quotes from many different life insurance companies please enter your ZIP code above to use the free quote tool. The more quotes you compare, the more chances to save.
Editorial Guidelines: We are a free online resource for anyone interested in learning more about life insurance. Our goal is to be an objective, third-party resource for everything life insurance-related. We update our site regularly, and all content is reviewed by life insurance experts.
Life insurance companies may soon take a different view of applicants’ foreign travel history and plans when considering applications for life insurance. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) recently adopted new guidelines aimed at protecting consumers from discriminatory underwriting practices by life insurance companies in the sale of life insurance. The guidelines modify the NAIC’s Unfair Trade Practices Model Act to limit an insurance company’s ability to deny an applicant life insurance based solely on lawful past travel or lawful future travel (under particular circumstance on the latter).
The new guidelines state that future travel cannot be the basis for a coverage decision unless travel to a specific location at a specific time is found to create a risk of loss greater than that for individuals who do not travel to that place at that time. Such findings must be based upon sound actuarial principals and actual or anticipated experience.
The language implies there is plenty of room for ‘interpretation,’ and seems somewhat ambiguous. Specifically, it will be interesting to see how life insurance companies adapt and justify their findings based upon ‘sound actuarial principals and actual or anticipated experience.’